The Real-time Contact Center Newsletter
Customer-focused Strategy, Operations and Technology November 2006
Donna's View
Donna Fluss is the founder and President of DMG Consulting LLC, a firm specializing in customer-focused business strategy, operations and technology services for Global 2000 and emerging companies. Ms. Fluss is a recognized thought leader and innovator in CRM, contact center and real-time analytics. For over 23 years, she has helped end users build world-class differentiated contact centers.



The Best in Self-Service

We all know that there are many lousy self-service applications – IVR and Web-based – out there in the market. We’ve all run into them when dealing with airlines, banks, brokers, insurance companies, retailers, telecommunications companies, electric and gas utilities, government agencies and amazingly, sometimes even emergency services (911). I’ve written a lot about poor self-service applications over the years, because they provide great examples of what not to do.

However, there are some outstanding and effective self-service environments, ones that customers actually enjoy calling and using. Clearly, these systems were developed by enterprises that asked their customers what they wanted and how they wanted it delivered before they built the application. These applications are constantly enhanced, taking into account ongoing customer feedback. High-quality applications have been delivered by companies that prioritized long-term customer relationships over short-term costs. These enterprises have invested – sometimes spending a lot of time, thought and money – in building self-service environments that are compelling and inviting. These companies appreciate the power of self-service for providing an outstanding customer experience, building their brand and reducing operating expenses.

Examples of Outstanding Self-Service Environments

Here are a few examples. T-Mobile is a cell phone provider. It provides a speech-enabled IVR that thinks and talks like customers, not like a robot. It allows users to interrupt and fast forward, so that they don’t have to wait until it finishes talking (just like many of us impatient people do during real conversations.) It speaks rapidly and clearly and keeps the call moving, instead of going so slowly that it feels like the conversation will never end. If the system is not sure of what the speaker says, it verifies; otherwise, it does not. (For example, when it recognized a cell phone number, it didn’t repeat it. When it wasn’t sure and could not find my cell number on file, it repeated back what it heard so that I could correct it.) Very importantly, when I asked for an operator, it asked only once why I wanted an agent, so that it could direct my call. It didn’t lock me into “IVR-jail” and force me to keep repeating my request, a common problem with IVRs. The application wasn’t perfect; when it asked me what language I wanted, English or Spanish, and I answered French, it put me into its Spanish script – I’m guessing that it defaults to Spanish if the speaker doesn’t say English. I suggest that you give it a call and test it out. The number to call is 1-800-937-8997. Of course, it helps to have or borrow (as I did) a T-Mobile account number if you want to put the application through its paces.

A second example of an excellent self service environment is the Amtrak speech-enabled IVR for schedule information and fares, which is referred to as Julie, as that is how the automated voice addresses herself. Julie is all business and doesn’t waste time. She keeps the call moving, asks the right questions and make sure the caller doesn’t worry about getting locked into a trip accidentally. For example, when researching schedules, Julie says that no fares will be booked until the end of the call. Julie allows callers to research schedules without having an exact date – avoiding a common reason for drop-off in many similar IVRs. Give Julie a call at 800-872-7245. Like T-Mobile’s IVR, Amtrak’s was so pleasant that it’s unlikely that I’ll return to using live agents. Julie answers quickly, is very pleasant, doesn’t waste my time and gets the job done.

On the Web self-service side, FedEx does an excellent job. A customer who wants to know the location of a FedEx shipment only has to go to the home page. By typing in the package tracking number, the customer can immediately find out everything about the package’s status. If it has been delivered, the screen shows who signed for it and exactly when. If it hasn’t been delivered, the site tells exactly where the shipment is and provides a realistic expectation about when it will arrive. This Web site is an easy-to-use and informative resource that quickly gives people the information they need, eliminating the need to call and check on package status.

Self-Service Honor Roll

DMG Consulting has decided to track good customer self-service systems, whether IVR or Web-based. It’s time to recognize companies that are doing an excellent job and investing in their customers. If you have found a compelling and useful self-service environment, please send us an email with the company’s name, the system’s phone number or URL and a short description of what you like about the application. Or, visit our Web site at www.dmgconsult.com and fill out a Self-Service Honor Roll Submission Form. We’ll check them out, put together a Self-Service Honor Roll and publish it on our Web site. We’ll also periodically publish the names of the best self-service environments. Please send your emails to Deborah.navarra@dmgconsult.com. For more information, please call Debbie Navarra at 516-628-1098.

Regards,

Donna Fluss

President, DMG Consulting LLC

What's New
11/09/2006 An ROI Tutorial: How to Build a Business Case for Customer Intelligence Through Speech Analytics
10/18/2006 What Customers Say And How They Say It (The Washington Post)
10/16/2006 Hosting Expands Technology Choices for Contact Centers
10/03/2006 Witness Eyes the Enterprise (destinationCRM.com)
10/02/2006 Ask The CRM Expert: Questions & Answers (SearchCRM.com)
10/01/2006 Quality & Recording Solutions Keep Getting Better
09/20/2006 At-home Agent Business Case and Best Practices
09/19/2006 What’s New in the IVR World
09/18/2006 Quality Management and Recording Suites Capitalizing on Shifting Contact Center Market
09/15/2006 Hosted Contact Center Solutions Vendor Guide
09/08/2006 CRM ROI Series: Building a Business Case for Remote Call Center Agents
Ask the Experts

Can you explain the benefits of remote agents (outside of the obvious -- cost savings)? Can their performance be tracked using traditional methods? Do you have some numbers to make a case for this arrangement?

At-home (remote) agents are becoming increasingly popular in the US, as enterprises search for ways to keep their costs down and their agents satisfied. The significant adoption of IP in enterprises and contact centers has also contributed to the growth rate of at-home agents.

Enterprises realize both hard (quantifiable) and soft (difficult to measure) benefits from employing at-home agents. Cost savings are realized from reduction in facility expenses, salary rates, benefits and, in some cases, hardware (when agents provide their own). Another benefit is that at-home agents eliminate geographical recruiting boundaries. With at-home agents, enterprises are able to source from a virtually unlimited area and can target highly skilled agents who are multi-lingual and who can support regional and cultural differences. Enterprises with seasonal/peak hiring needs, the need for off-hours or time zone staffing can greatly benefit from the flexibility of at-home agents. For example, some enterprises pay at-home agents a low fee to be on standby and a higher rate if they are needed. Additionally, at-home agents can be an important element of a business contingency plan.

Current contact center technology offers centralized management of distributed networks, which can support an at-home agent environment. Additionally, quality management/liability recording suites with eLearning, coaching and performance management capabilities enable supervisors to easily track, monitor and manage remote agents. Online training tools and help features are readily available in most applications and if an agent needs real-time assistance, a supervisor is only an IM away.

The best approach for obtaining approval for an at-home agent program is to justify it based on quantifiable hard dollar savings. Hard benefits include cost avoidance due to reduction in facilities, utilities, salaries and benefits. Additional soft benefits include increased agent satisfaction, retention, improvements in attendance and punctuality and an improvement in the customer experience.

A recent study of at-home agents by Booz Allen provided the following statistics, which are very hard to ignore:

  • At-home agents have a 10% attrition rate, which is significantly lower than for on-site staff
  • At-home agents are 25% more productive
  • At-home agents cost $11 less/hour
  • The average age of at-home agents is 30 to 48, vs. an 18- to 28-year-old average for those who work on-site
  • When interviewing prospects for a contact center, most organizations hire 1 out of 3. An outsourcer that specializes in at-home agents said that it hires 1 out of 20 and can really focus on hiring the best people.

There are a variety of at-home agent models. Some enterprises hire them outright and provide them with all of the technology. In other situations, the at-home agents buy their own technology and are contractors. In some situations, the agents pay for their own training -- as you can imagine, this further reduces the rate of attrition as the agent has "skin in the game."

Ask DMG's Experts a Question

Contact Us  |   Ask DMG's Experts   |   Forward  |   Unsubscribe Copyright 2001-2006 DMG Consulting LLC